Deception
By Rand Paul
This book may
come across as a grudge match between Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci. It could also be viewed as a legal briefing
against the perpetrators of Covid 19. Yet it is fraught with enough fact disclosed by
the alphabet regulators of the human health society that warrants further
discussion. Rand Paul alleges that we
were deceived as to the origin of Covid 19.
We were deceived as to the science behind brining it under control. It is also clear that our Democrat president
Biden and Democrat controlled Congress turned a blind eye to the deception as
they wreaked havoc on our society.
It becomes real
clear the Covis 19 virus was the result of a lab leak in Wuhan China. Even Dr Shi of the Wuhan Lab admits that. Yet to cover for the years of hubris denial Fauci
pleads the fifth. Unfortunately, in
recent trial hearing with the protection of a Presidential pardon, Fauci dismissed
the opportunity to leave the grudge match alone and cooperate in a hearing that
would produce a restructuring of our human health society to ensure the tragedy
of Covid 19 is not ever repeated. At the
conclusion, the first step is to not allow ONE person to sit as king over such
a large and poorly defined Human Health Society.
If indeed a
Congressional Hearing or a DOJ hearing does manifest we can proceed with calling
Peter Danszak to the stand as our first witness/defendant. My guess is his testimony would draw Fauci out. Paul concludes with this comment: “Some worry
that the deception, the cover-up, and the elaborate escape from responsibility
will succeed and Fauci, the Wuhan lab, and Peter Daszak will somehow avoid
culpability.” Daszak did fund Covid 19
research in Wuhan China. Fauci
masterminded it. In my view: let them
toss and turn in their beds in the prisons of their own minds for the rest of
their lives, knowing they are responsible for the deaths of 7,114,321 people. The goal is to restructure our Human Health
society.
Noteworthy
excerpts:
2.
"continue to be astonished at the lack of
curiosity among Democrats and the mainstream media who for two years viewed
COVID as such a great threat to humankind that it warranted the denial of civil
liberties and education to millions of Americans. And now, they shrug"
3.
"My speech condemned the $900 billion
coronavirus relief package attached to a $1.4 trillion spending bill. This
COVID welfare bill was once again sending checks to everyone regardless of
whether the individual had lost his job or not."
4.
"Why does it matter? Because
gain-of-function research with laboratory-created viruses not found in nature
could cause a pandemic even worse the next time. We are suffering today from
one that has a mortality of approximately 1 percent. They are experimenting
with viruses that have mortalities of between 15 and 50 percent.14"
5.
"Why does it matter? Because
gain-of-function research with laboratory-created viruses not found in nature
could cause a pandemic even worse the next time. We are suffering today from
one that has a mortality of approximately 1 percent. They are experimenting
with viruses that have mortalities of between 15 and 50 percent.14 Yes, our
civilization could be at risk from one of these viruses. Experiments that
combine unknown viruses with known pandemic-causing viruses are incredibly
risky. Experiments that combine unknown viruses with coronaviruses that have as
much as 50 percent mortality could endanger civilization as we know it. And
here you sit, unwilling to accept any responsibility for the current pandemic,
and unwilling to take any steps to prevent gain-of-function research from
possibly unleashing an even more deadly virus."
6.
"t virus will create a future pandemic.
Such a broad criterion gives one sole committee, comprised of an unknown group
of bureaucrats, the power to spend millions of taxpayer dollars on a single
preemptive guess—with potentially devastating consequences. Today we will also
consider whether gain-of-function research was being performed at the Wuhan
Institute of Virology. First, no one—not myself or anyone I’m aware of—argues
that a recombinant super-virus that has been published in scientific journals
is COVID-19 or a close relative. If COVID-19 leaked from the Wuhan lab, it
would be a laboratory-created virus that the Wuhan scientists have not yet, and
are unlikely to ever, reveal."
7.
"So why search for new pandemic viruses?
The enticing idea: If researchers could learn which of the estimated 500,000
animal viruses that could spill over into humans might actually cause the next
pandemic, then we may be able to prepare defenses against the most threatening
ones. But to credibly identify a single virus as capable of causing a pandemic
is to give thousands the power to wield it as a weapon. To discover many
dangerous viruses, or learn to enhance weaker ones, is to share the blueprints
for an arsenal of plagues."
8.
"But before we discover viruses that might rival nuclear
weapons in lethality, we should be aware that the consequences of misuse could
be worse than if any of those pathogens spilled over naturally. A malevolent
individual could introduce multiple pandemic viruses in different locations
around the world—say, at half a dozen major airports—making containment nearly
impossible."
9.
"Thankfully, we don’t yet know of any
animal viruses expected to cause a pandemic if deliberately released. That
won’t last if gain-of-function research projects succeed in engineering or
evolving ones that can. Even more alarmingly, multiple health agencies around
the world are actively funding efforts to find, study and rank-order the animal
viruses most likely to cause a new pandemic. These projects are the work of
well-meaning scientists doing their best to save us from natural plagues. But
they are biomedical researchers and epidemiologists, not defense experts;
security and nonproliferation issues aren’t part of their training or mandate.
Once we consider the possibility of misuse, let alone creative misuse, such
research looks like a gamble that civilization can’t afford to risk."
10. "Thankfully,
we don’t yet know of any animal viruses expected to cause a pandemic if
deliberately released. That won’t last if gain-of-function research projects
succeed in engineering or evolving ones that can. Even more alarmingly,
multiple health agencies around the world are actively funding efforts to find,
study and rank-order the animal viruses most likely to cause a new pandemic.
These projects are the work of well-meaning scientists doing their best to save
us from natural plagues. But they are biomedical researchers and
epidemiologists, not defense experts; security and nonproliferation issues
aren’t part of their training or mandate. Once we consider the possibility of
misuse, let alone creative misuse, such research looks like a gamble that civilization
can’t afford to risk."
11. "According
to Dr. Quay, “The Nipah virus is a smaller virus than SARS2 and is much less
transmissible. But it is one of the deadliest viruses, with a [greater than]
60% lethality. This is 60-times deadlier than SARS2. The lab where the human
specimens were processed is not the highest level biosafety lab, BSL-4, but was
in the BSL-2 or -3 facility.”34 If Quay is right, our worries about COVID-19
are only the tip of the iceberg."
12. "Perhaps
then we would start to question some of the absurd “scientific” research grants
such as the $2.3 million the NIH spent injecting beagle puppies with cocaine,
or the $3 million NIH grant to watch hamsters on steroids fight."
13. "Perhaps
then we would start to question some of the absurd “scientific” research grants
such as the $2.3 million the NIH spent injecting beagle puppies with cocaine,
or the $3 million NIH grant to watch hamsters on steroids fight.11 Perhaps if
we had scientists representing other specialties on these committees, they
would recognize such
14. absurdity
and could direct these funds to cancer research instead. Government research
funds should—at the very least—pass the common-sense smell test. I think most
Americans would conclude that spending $700,000 of autism money to study what
Neil Armstrong said when he first walked on the moon—was it “One small step for
man” or “One small step for a man?”—is a waste of money.12 These are funds that
could be better spent on actual autism research."
15. "It
boggles the mind that General Zhou and Dr. Shi collaborated and were together
awarded at least three NIH grants. The U.S. government literally funded a
bioweapons military expert in China."
16. "Musk’s
tweet was in response to a montage video of my exchanges with Fauci where Fauci
repeatedly and pointedly denied funding any “gain-of-function” research."
17. "These
scientists are the canary in the coal mine, and the real question should be to
these objective scientists: Do they sleep well knowing that Dr. Fauci and his
decades of appointees seem not to have learned any lesson, nor gained any
insight into the dangers of gain-of-function research? If millions of deaths in
a worldwide pandemic are not enough, what will be?"
18. Some
worry that the deception, the cover-up, and the elaborate escape from
responsibility will succeed and Fauci, the Wuhan lab, and Peter Daszak will
somehow avoid culpability."
