Saturday, June 29, 2013

East of Eden

East of Eden
by John Steinbeck

At the core of Steinbeck’s message is what differentiates us from animals is choice.  We know that right?  It's about timshel.  It's root comes from the Bible in the story of Cain and Able.  Timshel is about God blessing man with free will.  But there is a slight distinction.  In a wolf thou will choose.  In humans, they may choose. There are a couple of prime characters who make a choice in marriage where virtue becomes yet a gain in a classic novel the center theme.  Adam Trask represents ‘thou mayest'. Adam Trask represents a character of blind virtue.  Cathy, later Kate represents a monstrous life of ‘thou will’.

Adam begins his adult life going against his core character to be a sensitive creative person and obeying his father’s orders by becoming a military man.    After years of going against the grain in the military, he is discharged only to wonder lost, broke and homeless; the life of a Hobo across the country of the late 1800’s.  He needed to find himself.  He climbs out of this abyss of life to take up his place in his brother’s home in Connecticut.  The living arrangements were doomed from the beginning as the two brothers though raised by the same military man, were total opposites. 

In the course of Adam’s sad beginning Cathy as she was called in the beginning of the book had also a dismal start.  She and Adam were on a collision course. Steinbeck introduces her character in the following way.  “I believe there are monsters born in the world to human parents.  Some you can see, misshapen and horrible, with huge heads or tiny bodies, some born with no arms, no legs, some with three arms, some with tails or mouths in odd places.  They are accidents and no one’s fault as used to be thought.  Once they were considered the visible punishments for concealed sins.

And just as there are physical monsters, can there not be mental or psychic monsters born?  The face and body may be perfect, but there is a twisted gene or a malformed egg can produce physical monsters, may not the same process produce a malformed soul?”

Notice Steinbeck forms this thesis with question marks.  He goes on to discuss the ramifications of monsters as follows.  “Monsters are variations from the accepted normal to a greater or a less degree.  As a child may be born without an arm, so one may he be born without kindness or the potential of conscience.  A man who loses his arms in an accident has a great struggle to adjust himself to the lack, but one born without arms suffers only from people who find him strange.  Having never had arms, he cannot miss them.  Some times when we are little we imagine how it would be to have wings, but there is no reason to suppose it is the same feeling birds have.  No to a monster the norm must seem monstrous, since everyone is normal to himself.  To the inner monster it must be even more obscure, since he has no visible thing to compare with others.  To a man born without a conscience, a soul-stricken man must seem ridiculous.  To a criminal, honesty is foolish. You must not forget that a monster is only a variation, and that to a monster the norm is monstrous.”  This question I think captured the attention of millions who have read this book.  So I now know I am not alone in dealing with such a monster.  This book speaks to our humanity on the question of virtue and how only human beings are challenged with the choice to be virtuous or not.  A dog is loyal to a cruel master.  A woman can sell out her virtue to a man who has blessed her with mere material kindness.   

While there are many sub-story lines in the book that raise the question of choice, Cathy who turns to a prostitute who becomes Kate the madam of a brothel is the thread that Steinbeck pulls through the book in an attempt to look at choice, virtue and a monster.  Was Cathy born a monster? Or was she born into a monstrous world?  Steinbeck is not real clear in answering the fist question, but I think he is saying that she was born a monster and therefore created a monstrous life for herself.   To the second question her early life was not a bed of roses.  She found herself in desperate situations making desperate choices.  Early on she learned to utilize her female assets to raise her prospects in living comfort.  Her choices through the book were not trivial or an act of survival, but rather brutal as an act of vengeance. 

Through the twists and turns of revenge drama, Cathy finds herself left for dead at the hand of one of her victims on the side of the road.  Her evil deeds had caught up with her.  Adam Trask, who had really not found himself yet, discovers her and brings her home to nurture her back to life.  In the course of his service he began to let pity paint her as a virtuous woman who met with a bad turn of fate.  He blinded himself from her monstrous nature.  He fell in love with her and married her.  I know this mistake.  She conceded to marriage as a temporary escape root to the legal situation she may have been facing.  Marrying Adam and moving west to California was a new lease on life, at Adam’s expense.  There was no love in her heart.  In fact on their wedding night, she bedded down with Adam, and then after he fell asleep she went into his brother’s room, woke him up and fucked him too.  I know women, one in particular capable of this, leading me to draw a conclusion as to why the book was popular.  I sure wished I had read this book 20 years ago.

Cathy the prostitute on the lamb, rather than assume the loving environment of family and a good husband, shoots Adam in the shoulder and leaves him for dead as she heads not too far down the road and takes a job turning tricks in a brothel. This goes to Stienbeck’s monster theory.  Cathy now Kate, is back in her comfort zone of virtue-less deceit. She knows no other life.  She cannot make a better choice, as it is foreign to her thinking.  Eventually her high marks with the Madame of the brothel earn her the opportunity to murder her in a very discrete way.  So now she, as Madame of the brothel has control of all the city leaders who have surrendered their virtue to her house.  I am amazed at the result on society when virtue is surrendered.

She is in control of everything…until time’s two edge sword cuts her to shreds.  As it runs out on her where people discover her crimes, her deteriorating health makes life … living painful.  She like Anna Karenina commits suicide. So Steinbeck, like Tolstoy, leaves it for the reader to interpret their allegoric answer.   If the higher being, human though it may be, is the sole domain of choice; did Kate…Anna with loss of virtue exercise choice, or were they monsters out of control?   Both East of Edin and Anna Karenin ended with the husband completing his life in peace.  Personally, after my twenty year dance with the devils daughter, I look forward to the same.

The distinct moral message from Steinbeck:  Is presented in a two page dissertation by Steinbeck in Chapter 13:  Here is an excerpt:  Our species is the only creative species, and it has only one creative instrument, the individual mind and spirit of man.  Nothing was ever created by two men.  There are no good collaborations, whether in music, in art, in poetry, in Mathematics, in philosophy. Once the miracle of creation has taken place, the group can build and extend it, but the group never invents anything.  The preciousness lies n the lonely mind of man.

And now the forces marshaled around the concept of the group have declared a war of extermination on that preciousness, the mind of man.  My disparagement, by starvation, by repressions, forced direction, and the stunning hammer blows of conditioning, the free, roving mind is being pursued, roped, blunted, and drugged.  It is sad suicidal course our species seems to have taken.

And this I believe: that the free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world.  And this I would fight for: the freedom of the mind to take any direction it wishes, undirected.  And this I must fight for against: any religion or government which limits or destroys the individual.  This is what I am and what I am about.  I can understand what a system built on a pattern must try to destroy the free mind, for that is the one thing that can by inspection destroy such a system.  Surely I can understand this and I hate it and I will fight against it to preserve the one thing that separates us from the uncreative beasts.  If the glory can be killed, we are lost.

In conjunction of the free mind Steinbeck brings in the dichotomy of Cain and Able.  Cathy’s twin sons, one by Adam and one by his brother, a double untundered construct all by itself that takes on the theme of Cain and Able from two perspectives.   Yes Cathy had sex with both brothers in the same night.  Neither ever knew of the other’s pleasure.  In the case of Adam and his brother; Adam is introverted and introspective.  His brother is egotistical and reactive.  Adam’s brother was resentful and did not treat Adam kindly.  He beat him once to near death out of jealousy.  A parallel is drawn between Adam’s sons. As obscure it may seem, there is a progression in the form of evolution of man away from violence.

Of Adam’s sons the introspective brother finds a life in religion and love for a girl.  He surrounds himself with aspects of society that are structured and safe.  The other brother was a free thinking maverick, always testing the fringes of acceptable society.  It was the maverick who found the courage to discover the truth about his prostitute mother Cathy.  Steinbeck draws a colorful picture of the mind of children at a loss for their mother, and their discovery of her evilness.  However, unlike his father’s sibling rivalry situation, the maverick loved his socially bound brother and would do anything to protect him.  Finally the legacy of Cain and Able is NOT carried forward. 

In my view, children inherit their moral personification of character from their parents.  God help them!!!! It’s up to a parent to recognize their own flaws and eradicate them in front of their children.  In absence of this too often found neglect of obligation, it is up to children to see the flaw and also make changes where the parent fails.  This comes from free thinking; creating the space for children to grow up in a peaceful setting and giving them the confidence to believe in themselves…evolve the human spirit  This goes to Steinbeck’s opening statement:  Our species is the only creative species, and it has only one creative instrument, the individual mind and spirit of man.  Amidst my own mistakes in life I strive to meet the lofty goal of one spirit with my children and openly pursue the evolution of One spirit of souls with them. I do it privately; Steinbeck makes a profound statement for millions of readers.

Bibliography

Page 19: When a child first catches adults out – when it first walks into his grave little head that adults do not have divine intelligence, that their judgments are not always wise, their thinking true, and their sentences just – his world falls into panic desolation.  The gods are fallen and all safety gone.  And there is one sure thing about the fall of gods:  they do not fall a little, they crash and shatter or sink deeply into green muck.  It is a tedious job to build them up again, they never quite shine.  And the child’s world is never quite whole again.  We are individuals and at the same time exist at soul level in the spirit of One.

Page 34:  It has always seemed strange to me that it is usually men like Adam who have done the soldiering.  He did not like fighting to start with, and far from learning to love it, as some men do, he felt increasing revulsion for violence

Page 54:  Time interval is a strange and contradictory matter in the mind.  It would be reasonable to suppose that a routine time or an eventless time would seem interminable.  It should be so, but it is not.  It is the dull eventless times that have no duration whatever.  A time splashed with interest, wounded with tragedy, crevassed with joy – that’s the time that seems long in memory.  And this is right when you think about it.  Eventlessness has no posts to drape duration on.  From nothing to nothing is no time at all.

Page 56:  [Of Adam’s character] he learned that when people are very poor they still have something to give and the impulse to give it.  He developed a love for poor people he could not have conceived if he had not been poor himself.

Page 69:  [Of Adam’s love for his father] “Maybe that’s the reason’ Adam said slowly, feeling his way. “ Maybe if I had loved him I would have been jealous of him. You were.  Maybe-maybe love makes you suspicious and doubting.  Is it true that when you love a woman you are never sure – never sure of her because you aren’t sure of yourself?

Page 88:  In all such local tragedies time works like a damp brush on water color.  The sharp edges blur, the ache goes out of it, the colors melt together, and from the many separated lines a solid gray emerges.  [a wonderful metaphor upon this story]  Within a month it was not necessary to hang someone, and within two months nearly everybody discovered that there wasn’t any real evidence against anyone.  If it had not been for Cathy’s murder, fire and robbery might have been a coincidence.  Then it occurred that without Cathy’s body you couldn’t prove anything though you thought she was dead.  Cathy left a sent of sweetness behind her

My comment:  I know very well a person of Cathy’s monstrous character.  It takes a monster to leverage time in the cover of her manipulative deeds.  It seems that when you lose virtue, you discover deceit.

Page 130:  Then a man pours himself outward, a torrent of him, and yet he is not diminished.  And I guess a man’s importance in the world can be measured by the quality and number of his glories.  It is a lonely thing but it relates us to the world.  It is the mother of all creativeness, and it sets each man separate from all other men.

Page :  131:  Our species is the only creative species, and it has only one creative instrument, the individual mind and spirit of man.  Nothing was ever created by two men.  There are no good collaborations, whether in music, in art, in poetry, in Mathematics, I philosophy. Once the miracle of creation has taken place, the group can build and extend it, but the group never invents anything.  The preciousness lies n the lonely mind of man.

And now the forces marshaled around the concept of the group have declared a war of extermination on that preciousness, the mind of man.  My disparagement, by starvation, by repressions, forced direction, and the stunning hammer blows of conditioning, the free, roving mind is being pursued, roped, blunted, and drugged.  It is sad suicidal course our species seems to have taken.

And this I believe: that the free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world.  And this I would fight for: the freedom of the mind to take any direction it wishes, undirected.  And this I must fight for against: any religion or government which limits or destroys the individual.  This is what I am and what I am about.  I can understand what a system built on a pattern must try to destroy the free mind, for that is the one thing that can by inspection destroy such a system.  Surely I can understand this and I hate it and I will fight against it to preserve the one thing that separates us from the uncreative beasts.  If the glory can be killed, we are lost.

Page 141: [metaphor] My wife is rumbling like round stones in the surf.   

Page 141: [metaphor] You’re right I do, and Liza says I do, shepherd my words like rebellious sheep.

Page 144:  [metaphor] Well a man’s mind can’t stay in time the way his body does

Page 149:  [metaphor]I went down and down until the wing tips of angles brushed my eyes.

Page 149:  [metaphor] When angered she had a terrible eye which could blanch the skin off a bad child as if he were a boiled almond.

Page 157:  [metaphor] If Adam rested like a sleek fed cat on his land, Cathy was catlike too,  She has the inhuman attribute of abandoning what she could not get and of waiting for what she could get…and pounce.

Page 180: [metaphor] “I’m afraid we’ve done a bad service to our dearies.: Samuel said. ‘Here she wanted to save it for a real tin-plate surprise to her mother and we’ve leaked it like wheat from a mouse hole in a sac.”

Page 183: [metaphor]  A woman gave a tooth to for a child. It was the law:  And a woman was likely to have strange tastes, some said for filth, and it was set down to the
 Eve nature, still under sentence for original sin.

It was if she had gone away and left a breathing doll to conceal her absence.

Adam fluttered like a bewildered bee confused by too many flowers.

Page 185:  [metaphor] And indeed they could see a horseman riding toward them at full gallop, but a curious horseman who flopped about on his mount like a tied chicken.

Page 188: [metaphor] I’ve been so close to the details, I’ve paid no attention to the clothing of the day.

Samuel said, “You stay close.  That sounds like Adam playing true.  He doesn’t know his wife probably couldn’t hear God Himself beating a tattoo on the sky.”

Page 216: [metaphor] The were not pure, but they could make something pretty fine of it within himself.

While churches, bringing the sweet smell of piety for the soul, came prancing and farting like brewery horses in bock-beer time, the sister evangelism, with release of joy for the body, crept in silently and greyly, with its head bowed and face covered.

Page 239: In Human affairs of danger and delicacy sucessful conclusion is sharply limited by hurry.  So often men trip by being in a rush.  If one were properly to perform a difficult and subtle act, he should inspect the end to be achieved and then, once he had accepted the end as desireable, he should forget it completely and concentrate solely on the the means.  By this method he would not be moved to false anxiety or hurry or fear.  Very few people learn this

Page 251: [metaphor] Samuel wrote to Joe, “ I would be disappointed if you had not become an atheist, And I read pleasantly that you have, in your age and wisdom, accepted agnosticism the way you’d take a cookie on a full stomach.”

It worries her, her faith is a mountain and you, my son, haven’t even got a shovel yet.”

Page 255: [metaphor] You turn it over the way a coon turns over a wet rock…

Page 256:  [metaphor] and this thought went from evening star to the late dipper on the edge of first light

I don’t understand you.  How could you?  Adam Trask, a dog wolf with a pair of cubs, a scrubby rooster with sweet paternity for a fertilized egg!  A dirty clod,

Page 264: [metaphor] “Two stories have haunted us and followed us from our beginning.” Samuel said.  “ we carry them along with us like invisible tales – the story of original sin and the story of Cain and Able.  I don’t understand either of them.”

Page 266:  No story has power, nor will it last, unless we feel in ourselves that it is true and true of us.  What a great burden of guilt men have!

Page 268:  [Cain and Able story]  I think it is the best-known story in the world because it is everybody’s story.  I think it is the symbol story of the human soul.

 It is all there – the start, the beginning.  One child, refused the love he craves, kicks the cat and hides secret guilt, and another steals so that money will make him loved, and a third conquers the world – always the guilt and re revenge and more guilt.  The human is the only guilty animal.  Therefore I think this old and terrible story is important because it is a chart of the soul – the secret, rejected, guilty soul.

Page 269:  [metaphor] Oh, I wonder how my Tom will think of this!   He’ll cradle it in the palm of his mind.  He’ll turn it like slow pork in his brain like a roast of pork before the fire.

Page 274:  [metaphor] But she had the loveliest hands and feet.  Her ankles were as slender as grass and she moved like grass.

Page 280:  [metaphor] Samuel rode lightly on top of a book and he balanced happily among ideas the way a man rides white rapids in a canoe.

Page 284 [metaphor] I don’t think he’ do it said Will.  ‘He’s stubborn like a mule and proud like a horse.  He’s got a pride like brass.”

Page 285:  [metaphor] He says himself that a thing about time doing the job dynamite can’t touch.”

Page 290:  I have wondered why it Is that some people are less affected and torn by the verities of life and death than others.  Una’s death [metaphor] cut the earth from under Samuel’s feet and opened his defended keep and let in old age. On the other hand Liza, who surely loved her family as deeply as did her husband was not destroyed oe warped.  Her life continued evenly, she felt sorrow, but she survived it.

I think perhaps Liza accepted the world as she accepted the Bible, with all its paradoxes and its reverses.  She did not like death as knew it existed, and when it came it did not surprise her.

Page 291:  She had no love of places.  A place was only a resting place on the way the Heaven.

Page 293:  “I know the ‘shoulds’ although I never do them, Adam.  I always know the ‘should.’.  You should try to find the new Cathy.  You should let the new Cathy kill the dream Cathy – let the two of them fight it out.  And you sitting by, should marry you mind to the winner. That’s the second best should.  The best would be to search out and find some fresh new loveliness to cancel out the old.

Page 301:  “Ah!”  said Lee.  “I’ve wanted to tell you this for a long time.  I even anticipated your questions and I am well prepared.  Any writing which has influenced the thinking and lives of innumerable people is important.  Now, there are millions in their sects and churches who feel the order, ‘Do thou’, and throw their weight into obedience.  And there are millions more who feel predestination in ‘Thou shalt.’  Nothing they may do can interfere with what will be.  But ‘Thou mayest’!  Why that makes a man great, that gives him stature with the gods, for in his weakness and his filth and his murder of his brother he still has the great choice.  He can choose his course and fight it through and win.”  Lee’s voice was a chant of triumph.

Page 303:  “Neither do I,” said Lee.  I take my two pipes in the afternoon no more no less, like the elders.  And I feel that I am a man.  And I feel that a man is a very important thing – maybe more important that a star.  This is not theology.  I have no bent towards gods.  But I have a new love for that shiny instrument, the human soul.  It is a lovely and unique thing of the universe.  It is attacked and never destroyed – because ‘Though mayest.”

Page 303:[metaphor]  He’s about as ugly a crow bait as I ever saw.

Page 306: [metaphor] Your mind is as facile as a young lamb leaping in a daisy field

Page 321:  Adam shivered. He looked closely at her.  Her face and her laughter were childlike and innocent.  He got up and poured himself another drink.  The bottle was nearly empty.  “I know what you hate.  You hate something in them you can’t understand.  You don’t hate their evil.  You hate the good in them you can’t get at.  I wonder what you want, what final thing.”

My comment: I suppose I book marked this for two reasons.  First I truly appreciate a guy reaching the bottom of a bottle trying to figure out an evil wife.  Second, I know first hand that from evil comes jealousy, jealousy of those who can't overcome evil.

Page 328:  [of Sam Hamilton, deceased] “Maybe both of us have a piece of him,” said Lee, Maybe that is what immortality is.”

My comment:  I first read this comment in a scientific book by Hofstadter.  The immortality of a person lay in his thought, an energy that cannot be destroyed.  I accept this concept and because I do, I see it everywhere.  Coincidence, I think not?  It’s the collective humanity coming to the same conclusion in a timeless expression of what is.

Page 369:  [metaphor] He pinched a dollar until the eagle screamed.

Page 370:  [metaphor] and it was as restless as a setting hen scrounging into the nest.

Page 381:  Adam said, “I guess you can’t understand it.  I don’t much care.  There are so many things I don’t understand.  I don’t understand how you could shoot me and desert your sons.  I don’t understand how you or anyone could live like this.”

My comment:  I suppose I bookmarked this because metaphorically my wife shot me, though she didn’t literally shoot me, nor abandon her children physically, she abandoned them spiritually.  I think upon reading these words, I came to appreciate that indeed my ex-wife is a monster and that I created an angel in my image…by mistake.   I now give full stock to the phrase, things are themselves by themselves.  It took me to make her what she was not.  I paid dearly.

Page 382:  “ no I won’t because I seem to know that there’s a part of you missing.  Some men can’t see the color green, but they may never know they can’t.  I think you are only part of a human.  I can’t do anything about that.  But I wonder whether you ever feel that something invisible is all around you.  It would be horrible if you knew it was there and couldn’t see or feel it.  That would be horrible.

My comment:  Through Steinbeck’s character and story, I see clearly now my view of my ex-wife.  I think she is horrified.  I pray that she one day finds her peace.  Kitty/Cathy and Anna Karenina, found it through suicide.  How tragic.  Neither sought help.  Neither did my ex-wife.

Page 385:  [metaphor] “something is the matter with Tom.  He’s moping around like a monument.”

Page 387: [metaphor] she carried excitement in her arms

Page 405: [metaphor] He shuffled possibilities like cards

Page 411:  I believe that there is one story in the world, and only one, that has frightened and inspired us, so that we live in a Pearl White serial of continuing thought and wonder.  Humans are caught – in their lives, in their thoughts, in their hungers and ambitions, and their avarice and cruelty, and in their kindness and generosity too- in a net of good and evil.  I think this is the only story we have and it occurs on all levels of feeling and intelligence.  Virtue and vice were warp and woof of our first consciousness, and they will be the fabric of our last, and this despite any changes we impose on field and river and mountain, on economy and manners.  There is no other story.  A man, after he has brushed off the dust and chips of his life will have left only the hard, clean questions:  Was it good or was it evil?  Have I done well – or ill?

Page 415:  [metaphor]  There is nothing sadder to me than associations held together by nothing but glue of postage stamps.

Page 441:  Things do not change with a change of scene.  In Salinas, Cal had no more friends than he had in King City.  Associates he had, and authority and some admiration, but friends he did not have.  He lived alone and walked alone.

Page 442:  I never forget the time she shot him and ran away.  Plugged him in the shoulder and just run off.  Well she wasn’t no good as a wife, but she’s sure as hell a good whore.

My comment:  I can really identify with this statement.

Page 444:  “Cal” Adam said, “I’ve thought about it for a great many hours and I still don’t know.  She is a mystery.  It seems to me that she not like other people.  There is something she lacks.  Kindness maybe, or conscience.  You can only understand people if you feel them in yourself.  And I can’t feel her.  The moment I think about her my feeling goes into darkness. I don’t know what she wanted or what she was after.  She was full of hatred, but I don’t know why or toward what. It’s a mystery.  And her hatred wasn’t healthy.  It wasn’t angry.  It was heartless.  I don’t know that it is good to talk to you like this.

My comment:  I can really identify with this statement.

Page 449:  [metaphor] As the fear began to chill, resentment took its place.  So might a trapped fox feel anger towards its paw which held him to the trap.

Page 519:  I was thinking about that time when Sam Hamilton and you and I had a long discussion about a word, “said Adam.  “What was that word?”  “Now I see the word was timshel.” (a mans choice between good and evil.   “Timshel – and you said-“
“I said that word carried a man’s greatness if he wanted to take advantage of it.

Page 530:  There was pride in it, and relief too.  The split second has been growing more and more important to us. And as human activities become more and more intermeshed and integrated, the split tenth second will emerge, and then a new name must be made for the split hundredth , until one day, although I don’t believe it, we’ll say “Oh the hell with it.  What’s wrong with an hour?”  But it isn’t silly, this preoccupation with small time units.  One thing late or early can disrupt everything around it and the disturbance runs outward in bands like waves from a dropped stone in a quiet pool.

Page 532:  [metaphor] He felt let down and helpless, packed like a bird’s egg in cotton of his father’s ambition

Page 538:  [metaphor] “Maybe knowledge is too great and maybe men are growing too small,” said Lee.  “Maybe, kneeling down to atoms, they’re becoming atom- sized in their souls.  Maybe a specialist is only a coward, afraid to look out of his little cage.  And think what any specialist misses- the whole world over his fence.

Page 542 [Lee’s advice to Cal] “He couldn’t help it, Cal.   That’s his nature.  It was the only way he knew.  He didn’t have any choice.  But you have.  Don’t you hear me you have a choice.”

Page 545: [metaphor] Kate wasn’t thinking.  Her mind drifted among impressions the way a bat drifts and swoops in the evening.

Anna Karenina

Anna Karenina
By Leo Tolstoy
This book has been on my list for ever.  First because it’s Tolstoy.  Second it’s a ‘chick’ book, or so I thought.  But really, it was simply next on the list. However coincidentally, its theme has much in common with books I have read over the past year.  This book, along with East of Edin and Answer Like a Man all deal on some level with virtue; specifically a woman’s lack of it.  I read each of these books at random urges where coincidence of theme was unbeknownst to me as the books sat silently on their shelves.  Ironically and coincidentally, I personally endured the consequences of this trait in society.  While I have torn myself up over it over in the past year, I am somewhat mollified by the fact that from prolific authors; Leo Tolstoy, John Steinbeck, Taylor Caldwell, and to include Guatav Flaubert's  Madame Bovary, one finds that virtue and women do not automatically go hand in hand.  To make my point, society over a hundred year span of time has made each of these books best sellers of their day and classics of today.  Why? Is a woman’s virtue to be tested as in Anna Karenina?  A woman’s beauty teases men and vexes society of both men and women.  Is a flower only to be seen and not touched at will?  Love of animal nature has no choice.  Like bees to a flower men pursue.  Like a flower should a woman surrender to each one?  By whom and how is the choice for virtue made.  What is the rationale for or against virtue?  These are the questions that Tolstoy explores on a word, a symbol of reality, where the meaning’s are conflicted.
The book opens with an affair of Anna’s cousin.  For which Anna tells her husband that she is going to Moscow to advise her cousin to forgive her adulterous husband.  Anna’s husband’s first response is to question that adultery may be forgiven, especially by his wife.  Anna’s response is “do you think that nine years of marriage should count for nothing against an infatuation?”  His answer is “No, but sin has a price you may be sure of that.”  The book’s moral message is weaved through typical Tolstoy voluminous depth, including sub plots involving first Kitty and Constantine  and his brother who marries a whore.  Each sub plot helps the reader experience the cross-sections of each thread of a tapestry of sin.  Kitty at first turns down Constantine’s proposal for marriage but after observing Ann’s sins, along side Constantine’s bother’s honorable faux marriage; she changes her mind and becomes a virtuous wife.  Tolstoy leaves the reader to visualize a marriage of peasants held together by virtue.  It knows no gender as parties of all sides including the sidelines feel its tension. 
As the story goes:
Coincidentally enough; Anna rides the train to Moscow with the mother of her eventual adulterous lover who poses the question of gossip and love to Anna.  The mother says it always turns up that amidst the rumor she would always wish she had the affair, though she hadn’t.  She asks Anna her opinion and her response was “I don’t know.”  I am familiar with a mother capable of that statement. Are a mother’s sins  passed down to become sins of their sons and daughters?  Why does Tolstoy add this dynamic?  Well I suspect he is making a point that anyone can fall prey to society and infatuation, only to leave your life in ruins.  Upon leaving the train the arrogant son Bronski, son of the mother mentioned above who  is introduced to a Anna, a married woman and mother of a young son.  With this knowledge in hand he persists in yet immediate plots and assault on her virtue.  His methods are selfish, devious, and relentless.  I know a man capable of stooping to these bowels of character.
In this book Tolstoy deals with love at lust’s level.  At the height of orgasm Anna’s cries Oh “god forgive me, that’s the end of everything,   I have nothing left now but you.”  She cries murder, murder!  Alexi replies “I can only remember my happiness.”  For which Anna says, “You murdered my happiness.” All of her senses are lost.  Her soul is sold to the devil.   Love of the flesh is now managed by the heart alone.  Anna lives for her new lover’s happiness at the expense of all her family and most of all herself.  Her new found happiness is co-dependent on her lover.  Over time she realizes the ‘demons in her head’ in the form jealousy in her, but also knows it is too late for saving or redemption.
Tolstoy also balances this love with forgiveness, forgiveness in this case being a discipline of the mind/ego.  Anna falls prey to her passions, while being seduced by a gentleman and cavalry officer of society, Alexi Bronski.  It was new emotion in an otherwise very settled bourgeois life.  She was being pursued; it was refreshing compared to the life she was leading, albeit a very comfortable life as the wife of a minister of the Russian royal court.  While she was pleading for the fulfillment of her loins with Alexi her lover, she comes to realize her mistake on her apparent death bed. After baring Alexi’s child she asks her husband to forgive the both of them. 
In the course of her husbands struggle with this dichotomy of nerve and passion, Tolstoy plays out societies impressions.  In the drama, society is also vexed.  They sit at parties and consensus would hold that love, of Anna’s nature, is to die for.  It would be living and dying for your highest desire, be it right or wrong.  I believe it would be Voltaire who would say see!!!  And then at the same time that same society scorns Anna in her attempt to bring this new love into society without even concluding her divorce with her current husband.  I have experienced this in a woman who brings to life perpetual attacks of this disease.   The lesson of coincidence you would ask, I had no idea this was the plot or the plots of the previously mentioned books had parallel trends.  This book ends with Anna’s demise under the wheels of a train and her husband sitting comfortably with Anna’s children in a field reading a book.  In all books the virtuous live to see their virtue.  But for mankind the drama continues insanely.
Apparently betraying virtue haunts the soul; the aspect of man that lives through eternity.   Betrayal of virtue brings along an accomplice; jealousy.   Anna began to realize two things.  First she recognized the demons in her head during her jealous moments with Alexi.  She realized that she had nothing materially to be jealous for and that her jealousy was self born.  She also began to realize that her own adultery may have inflicted her jealousy on her lover. She asked him for forgiveness.  Anna was capable of asking for forgiveness and love but incapable of returning anything but animal lust.  Having received love, the unconditional acceptance of her being, from not one but two men outwardly, the conflicted Anna Karenina, at the peak of emotional despair threw herself under a moving train. 
So what is Tolsky trying to tell us?  I suspect he is saying that the conscience of society and the true nature of the animal in man are at odds with each other.  Conscience of man, that which makes us beings above animals has the luxury of choice.  Spirit of man is the fabric of society that scorns animal lust.  Spirit of society embraces a man and a woman in marriage if for no other reason than to spawn raise children, which in fact is the survival of our species.  Anna Karenina violated that virtuous quality in humans and her conscience as a consequence would not let her survive.  To Anna’s credit at least she had a conscience.  Victor Hugo’s Madam Bovary with her many lovers does not.  Mirror mirror in the sky what is love?
Virtue
A virtuous woman guards against seduction
Preoccupied with the beauty of innocence
To prowling libidos of wolves, devil’s temptation
She’s content to alluring dance yet portrays reluctance
Consumed by footsteps of over bearing passion
The lamb loses her footing to wolves’ persistence
Succumbed not to his demands but a hidden hand
Past the heat of passion it was hers to control
Once virtue surrenders, ego’s devises take command
The devil’s gimmicks are released and let out on parole
Conscience registers his vote to heart’s upper hand
To unconsciousness only her humor can she cajole
Is it the carnivorous nature of wolves and lambs?
Or is it the waltz of bee over the fragrant flower?
Lambs will bleat a beaeah an invitation to the wolf
The roosters will strut beneath the circling hawk
Is it moral excellence to give and take of love…making?
Can its courage see through the conflicted meaning?